CONTEXTUALISATION - LECTURE 2



Lecture 2 + Seminar - 16.10
AFFECT BEYOND THE HUMAN

Pre-reading based on Todd Cranan’s review of ‘Affect theory reader’: the Aesthetic Politics of Affect.  https://nonsite.org/radically-private-and-pretty-uncoded/
- post structuralism made language more important than pre-cognitive modes of awareness (ie gut feelings, emotions, body language), to be more basic
-’Affect constitutes a level of experience (that) cannont be translated into words without doing violence’ Anna Gibbs as mentioned in Todd Cranan’s text.
- Affect organises itself:
   _ challenge of affect theory (according to Patricia Clough) is to show how bodily matter bears information which overruns the information contained in any linguistic system.
   _ affect organises itself: eveyr other form of organisation (?) includes perception, cognition, meaning, language, etc... are not entirely separable from affects but secondary to them (p196)
   _ you can’t get from one to the other: language, no matter how intensely one deconstructs it, will never open onto affect.

- can Affects transcend time (inherited traumas or Ingrid’s premature example)? yes (links to decolonizing the experiences of a mixed person?)
   
- Deleuze-inspired writings of Brian massumi + followers ‘VS’ scientifically-minded followers of Eve Sedgewick:
DELEUZE
-Massumi: every form or image (information) is received by an agent ‘spontaneously + simultaneously’ in two orders of reality (one local/learned and the other non-local and self-organising:
   _ learned vs innate/animal-like/fight or flight/survival
   _intention + affect
   _meaning + sense
   _perception + experience
THESE CO-EXIST BUT DON’T CO-MINGLE, BUT YET STILL FUNCTION TOGETHER
-Roland Barthes: Affective states outplay the paradigm of dialetics by referring to  something that slips through the net of dialectical analysis (therefore the unknown, the ‘automatic’, the self-organised)
LECTURE WITH MAMBA
-how and where does affect and sensation take place
-are there things in the world we cannot sense (depends on how you define sense)
-are there any form of affective relations taking place in your work?
-affect has a lot to do with relations.

-aesthetics isn’t about the beautiful, it’s about experience (perception, aesthetic experience, sensation): see Caroline Jones ‘the senses’ aesthetic experience.
- the 60s/70s insisted on widening sensory spectrum shift from object to experience (smell, touch, factory art, land art, noise, was introduced to modernist white cube)
- happenings/feminist performances/living theatre/fluxus: extension of the body, widening sensory spectrum (Marshall McLuhan: the extension of man)
- where is institutional critique today in art?
- are there other forms of sensing environment, ecology? who has agency + power in terms of my practice , in relation to how I meet the world, my surroundings, questioning norms and structure.

- Affect= having an effect on (links to the emotionally affected felt by humans but this is still very human, how else?)
- affect arises in between when something/one has an effect on capacity to act and acted upon, who is acted upon and vice versa, agency, power, who says they have capacity to act
- affect is also not just about human emotions then
- a body is never defined by a body alone (reminds me of David Abram ‘we are human only in contact, in conviviality, with what is not human’)

- the affective turn (Patricia Clough): new configurations of bodies, technology materiality.
   _questions materiality + ecology
   _how do we define things based on where they are, who decides this
   _could there be other forms of being in certain environments, ecologies, societies
   _ affective TURN = more AWARENESS about this

-affect is a different way of thinking autonomy + subjetivity, goes against binary way of looking at things (object/subject, nature/culture) closer to assemblages, the becoming, everything is connected to something, you in relation to... bodies + its environment simultaneously. it is a folded cosmos (THE FOLD, Laura U. Marks): the bodies have changed when connected to each other, when unfolding they are changed again. what happens in that change? adds another awareness. UNFOLD=DECONSTRUCTING (see also Jane Bennett)

- can think of form of relations as a rhythm (folding + unfolding and the changes is a rythm), self is relational, related to environment:borders, geographies)
- active participation forces of non-human in events (see in THE FOLD).
- how can bodies, or cannot, assert themselves in those relations.
-materials are also ‘bodies’ (Jane Bennett)= vital materiality.

-see TAI SHANI for experimental writing as a method



Seminar - 17.10
AFFECT BEYOND THE HUMAN - click for link to assignement
Quotes from David Abram’s Spell of the Sensuous which made me think of this:
- ‘we  are human only in contact, in conviviality, with what is not human’ (ix)
- ‘the eyes, the skin, the tongues, ears, and nostrils - all are gates where our body receives the nourishment of otherness’ (ix)
- ‘phenomenological research began to suggest that the human mind was thoroughly dependent upon (and thoroughly influenced by) our forgotten relation with the encompassing earth’ (xi)


- the environment is also becoming while humans are becoming.
- what is sensing? who can sense and partake?
seminar assignement:
Are there any affective forces in your work? where is the relational in your work? is it affect if it’s between your thoughts having an effect on you?

-in terms of participation (physical) between people, people doing things  together (eg painting blindfolded)
-in terms of working with more-than-humans: planting trees, mushroom dyes, nettles (but that still feels like it’s from a very human perspective). the interaction / sitting with a tree that Mari Jerstad does.  
-ritual (transformation) also has an in-between / liminal state.
- making a difference as artists: a difference means a change.

-does something have to be folded before being unfolded?